Why creationism bears all the hallmarks of a conspiracy theory
A friend asked me why I bother about creationism. This article spells out my reasons. It has had some 150,000 reads since first published in The Conversation in February, and has been featured in Snopes and Yahoo! News, and attacked by Ken Ham and Bodie Hodge of Answers in Genesis, Jake Hebert Ph.D [sic] at the Institute for Creation Research, and others.
Many people around the world looked on aghast as they witnessed the harm done by conspiracy theories such as QAnon and the myth of the stolen US election that led to the attack on the US Capitol Building on January 6. Yet while these ideas will no doubt fade in time, there is arguably a much more enduring conspiracy theory that also pervades America in the form of young Earth creationism. And it’s one that we cannot ignore because it is dangerously opposed to science.
In the US today, up to 40% of adults agree with the young Earth creationist claim that all humans are descended from Adam and Eve within the past 10,000 years. They also believe that living creatures are the result of “special creation” rather than evolution and shared ancestry. And that Noah’s flood was worldwide and responsible for the sediments in the geologic column (layers of rock built up over millions of years), such as those exposed in the Grand Canyon.
Such beliefs derive from the doctrine of biblical infallibility, long accepted as integral to the faith of numerous evangelical and Baptist churches throughout the world, including the Free Church of Scotland. But I would argue that the present-day creationist movement is a fully fledged conspiracy theory. It meets all the criteria, offering a complete parallel universe with its own organisations and rules of evidence, and claims that the scientific establishment promoting evolution is an arrogant and morally corrupt elite.
This so-called elite supposedly conspires to monopolise academic employment and research grants. Its alleged objective is to deny divine authority, and the ultimate beneficiary and prime mover is Satan.
Creationism re-emerged in this form in reaction to the mid-20th century emphasis on science education. Its key text is the long-time best seller, The Genesis Flood, by John C Whitcomb and Henry M Morris. This provided the inspiration for Morris’s own Institute for Creation Research, and for its offshoots, Answers in Genesis and Creation Ministries International. [Note added: Ken Ham points out in his rebuttal that Answers in Genesis arose independently of the Institute for Creation Research, and that his article concerning denial of divine authority, cited in the previous paragraph and below, does not mention Satan by name.]
Ken Ham, the founder and chief executive of Answers in Genesis, is also responsible for the highly lucrative Ark Encounter theme park and Creation Museum in Kentucky. As a visit to any of these websites will show, their creationism is completely hostile to science, while paradoxically claiming to be scientific.
Demonising and discrediting
These are common conspiracy theory tactics at play. Creationists go to great lengths to demonise the proponents of evolution, and to undermine the overwhelming evidence in its favour.
There are numerous organisations, among them Biologos, the American Scientific Affiliation, the Faraday Institute, and the Clergy Letter Project, which describes themselves as “an endeavour designed to demonstrate that religion and science can be compatible”, that is, promoting evolution science within the context of religious belief. Even so, creationists insist on linking together the separate topics of evolution, materialist philosophy, and the promotion of atheism.
According to Answers in Genesis, evolution science is a work of Satan, while former US Congressman Paul Broun has described it as “a lie straight from the pit of hell”. When he said that, by the way, he was a member of the House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Like other conspiracy theorists, creationists immunise themselves from fact-based criticism. They label the study of the past as based on unprovable assumptions, thus disqualifying in advance the plain evidence of geology.
They then attack other evidence by focusing on specific frauds, such as Piltdown man – a hoax skeleton purportedly of a missing link between humans and other apes that was debunked more than 60 years ago – or the dinosaur-bird amalgam “Archaeoraptor”, discredited by sharp-eyed scientists before ever making it into the peer-reviewed literature (although not before making it into National Geographic).
One favourite target is Ernst Haeckel, whose pictures of embryos, published in 1874, are now considered to be seriously inaccurate. However, they do correctly draw attention to what most matters here: the features shared during development by different organisms – including humans – such as gill arches, a long tail, and eyes on the side rather than the front of the head, confirming they have a common ancestry.
Haeckel’s name appears on the Answers in Genesis website 92 times. He is also the subject of a lengthy chapter in Jonathan Wells’ Icons of Evolution; Science or Myth?. This book, which even has its own high school study guide, was what first convinced me, back in 2013, that creationism was a conspiracy theory.
More from The Conversation’s Expert guide to conspiracy theories here.
It is a splendid example of creationist tactics, using long-rectified shortcomings (such as those in early studies on Darwinian evolution in peppered moths, in response to changing colours following reduced pollution) to imply that the entire science is fraudulent. Wells has a real PhD in biology, a PhD acquired with the specific goal of “destroying Darwinism” – meaning evolution science – from the inside.
Wells is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute, a conservative thinktank which promotes creationism under the banner of “Intelligent Design”, and is also linked to other conspiracy theories, such as claims that the consensus on climate change is bogus, and that last November’s US presidential election was stolen. An article by a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute on the subject has now being removed from its website, but can be found here.
Conspiracy theories are always driven by some underlying concern or agenda. The theory that Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery, or that the 2020 US election was stolen, are about political legitimacy and will fade as the politicians promoting them fade from memory. The idea that COVID-19 does not exist is proving a little harder to dislodge, but scientists, such as those behind Respectful Insolence, are organising to fight back on science denial and misinformation.
I fear that the creationist conspiracy theory will not be so short-lived. It is driven by a deep-seated power struggle within religious communities, between modernists and literalists; between those who regard scripture as coming to us through human authors, however inspired, and those who regard it as a perfect supernatural revelation. And that is a struggle that will be with us for a long time to come.
Posted on September 19, 2021, in Creationism, Evolution, Geology, Politics, Religion, Science, Society and tagged Answers In Genesis, Centre for Intelligent Design, Conspiracy theories, Creationism, Evolution, Haeckel, Jonathan Wells, Peppered moth, Young Earth creationism. Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.
Reblogged this on Peddling and Scaling God and Darwin and commented:
A fine article by Paul Braterman on Creationism as a conspiracy theory.
My only caveat is that I don’t consider Creationism to stem from biblical infallibility or inerrancy
Otherwise great and reasoned rather than polemical
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t quite understand why you are singling out the Creationists as demonstrating a conspiracy in action: all religions possess this characteristic! They start off with brainwashing the young as practised by Jesuits – give us a child till he’s 7 and we’ll have him for life. And look at Muslims who are still exhibiting Middle Age thinking and practices, and yet, many are highly intelligent people
I have a good friend who happens to be an excellent physicist but who wears two hats: that of a physicist and that of an irrational believer in the Old and New Testaments of the bible. He believes that miracles are a manifestation of God’s power to change the rules of science at will, because God is omnipotent. Great pity that his God is working in strange and wondrous ways with humanity’s exposure and death caused by the C-19 Covid virus.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I learned about evolution, genetics and the true age of the Earth (4.6 by) from Catholic nuns.
Muslim and Jewish scientists accept all of these as valid. Buddhism is a way of living rather than a theology, and has nothing to say against Earth science.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Paul. Never stop showing up the dishonesty please. This is good work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My question is pretty simple. Assuming the Bible is incorrect as to our origins and we had a “Big-Bang”, then all life form begins. Where did the originating organisms come from to begin the lifeform in the first place? You had to have some form of water for them to live while in the Black Hole and they had to have varying forms. Plant organisms are different from fish and such..So who put them there to begin all life forms to give us a billion species of plant life, the same for insects, mammals, and more. Can you explain?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your question is not simple.
On current scientific opinion, our *Universe* began 13.8 billion years ago. We don’t know what caused that, or even if that’s a sensible question. Through processes quite well understood, we had the subsequent formation of atoms, stars, and planets, with our own solar system originating 4.5 billion years ago. Life was present by 3.5 billion years ago. How life became more complex, and how come plants are different from fish (an excellent question), is well understood in general terms; I recommend Coyne’s Why Evolution is True, and Shubin’s Some Assembly Required. The origin of life is an unsolved problem; for current thinking about possibilities, I recommend Wikipedia’s article “Abiogenesis”.
It is worth remembering that we didn’t know the origin of the elements until the 1950s, and until around 1900 we didn’t even know that the question made sense. But we do know, and have known since around 1750, that the Bible is not a scientific account (how could it be? and why should it be?)
I hope that helps
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Anti-Science Conspiracy Theories, Power, and Morality | Primate's Progress