Exposing the Roots of Young Earth Creationism
Long but worth it. See in particular the section “Advice from a Former Young Earth Creationist”. This post exposes Young Earth Creationism as a 20th-century heresy, with sinful disregard for reality. It also considers from the inside (as I cannot) the claims Creationists make based on Christian faith, and dismantles them. Compare my own posts Biblical literalism as blasphemy and Anti-Creationists need to think about tactics, extensive writings by my friend the geologist historian priest Michael Roberts, at Peddling and Scaling and elsewhere, and Numbers’ detailed scholarly analysis The Creationists.
For my own blog, I’ve settled on Primate’s Progress as title; a clear favourite. Many thanks to those who shared your thoughts on the matter, here and elsewhere. H/t John Bunyan, of course, but I shall do my best to avoid the Slough of Despond.
The Protestant consensus since the time of the Reformation has been that the physical universe and its history are real, not illusory. As God’s creation, the physical world conveys genuine information about the Creator and can serve to inform our interpretations of the Bible. Therefore, when geologists (many of them devout Christians) in the early 1800’s found that the rock layers showed the earth to be far older than the 6000 years derived from a literal reading of Genesis, Bible-believing Christians did not ignore, suppress, or lie about these findings. Rather, they adjusted their interpretation of the relevant Bible passages away from a simplistic literal reading, just as they had done 200 years earlier with the verses that depicted a stationary earth. Through about 1960, nearly all Christians, including conservative Old Testament scholars and most fundamentalists, were comfortable with interpretations of Genesis which accommodated an earth that was many…
View original post 17,724 more words
Posted on July 10, 2015, in Creationism, Evolution, Philosophy, Politics, Religion, Science and tagged Answers In Genesis, Biblical literalism, Christianity, Creationsm, Food geology, Letters to Creationists, Peddling and Scaling, Sedgwick. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.
Not only “sinful disregard for realtiy” but disregard for the Text itself. https://textsincontext.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/creation-young-earth-ham-nye-genesis-one/
My favorite from the “Appearance of Age” section:
Indeed, a believer has to rely on God’s truthfulness, which is why biblical literalism is blasphemy.
I recently came across his next sentence: “One has to be able to rely on God’s truthfulness if religion is to function. Or, to put it another way — if God went to enormous lengths to convince us that the world is billions of years old, who are we to disagree?”
Which is why I seriously maintain that for a believer, Young Earthism is blasphemy.